LENS ON EASE OF DOING BUSINESS – BRINGING GREATER INCLUSIVENESS IN THE CATEGORY OF SMALL COMPANIES
INTRODUCTION:
The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (hereinafter “MCA”) vide notification
bearing reference G.S.R. 92(E), dated 1st day
of February 2021 introduced the Companies (Specification of Definitions
Details) Amendment Rules, 2021 for amending the existing definition of ‘small company’
under the law for time being in force. The existence of the Companies Act, 2013
(hereinafter “the Act”) and subsequent amendments thereof supplemented with
rules made thereunder is well established with the object to facilitate effective
governance and promote simplicity in compliance for companies domiciled in the
Indian soil. A holistic approach towards company law has been the mandate that growth
of industries and the dynamic environment has posed.
Below
elucidated is an observation made to highlight the intention of the law:
The
Lok Sabha debate (December 16, 2014):
1. A
World Bank Report stated that that concerning ease of doing business in India,
India was ranked at 142 among 189 countries. So, people found that it is
difficult to do business here which is why the Act has undergone changes
in order to promote easy business doing.
2. After
the detailed consideration, there were some minor amendments which were
required in the Companies Act, 2013. Most of them are intended for one
purpose, that is, for the ease of doing business.
SMALL
COMPANIES – THE PRESENT POSITION:
Section
2(85) of the Act outrightly states that the companies which satisfy the
following conditions, and which do not fall under the explicit categories are
recognised as a small company:
·
The paid-up share capital of such company should
not exceed 50 lakh rupees AND
·
Turnover of such company should not exceed 2
crore rupees.
It
is imperative to understand that paid up capital (equity and preference
together) in the above condition shall be taken on present specific date for
ascertaining whether the entity is a small company and whereas turnover of a company
shall be taken from the profit and loss account of the immediately preceding
financial year.
However,
the following class of companies are explicitly kept aside from being termed as
a small company:
·
Public Company
·
a holding company or a subsidiary company
·
a company incorporated and registered under Section
8 of the Act
·
a company or body corporate registered and governed
by any special Act.
PURPOSE
OF CLASSIFICATION:
It
is perceived in the eyes of law that a small company is characterised by the
amount of funds deployed in its business and the quantum of revenue that such
business essentially generates. The character of a small company is the one in
which there are minimal operations with the number of resources available in hand.
The rationale behind a bifurcation into a category known as a small company is to
substantially reduce the compliance aspect and the associate cost which a company
may incur had it been a company other than a small company. The Act confers certain
benefits to small companies such as such companies may hold only 2 board
meetings in a calendar year, i.e., one Board Meeting in each
half of the calendar year with a minimum gap of ninety days between
the two meetings, such companies need not comply with the law with respect
to rotation of auditors, such companies need not prepare and attach a cash flow
statement in addition to the financial statements, there are less penalties for
small companies etc.
Below stated is an observation of the legislature that brings out the very intent of inclusion of a concept of a small company under the Act:
The
Lok Sabha debate (July 27, 2017):
Compliance
requirement which continues to be very high. It is good; it is
required. But, if it is too high, it hits the ease of doing business.
It can be high for large companies which have hundreds of employees and even
they have the accounts and compliance departments. But for a small
company, to have such stringent compliance standards will actually reduce the
ease of doing business.
Therefore,
an interpretation can be made out that the essence of a categorisation into a
small company is well justified concerning the quantum of investment that a
company shall incur on compliance.
AMENDING
THE DEFINITION:
During
the Indian Union Budget (2021-22), it was proposed to amend the existing definition
of a small company to bring in greater inclusiveness in such a category to make departure
from significant compliance requirement which was followed by a notification
from the MCA amending the definition. This amendment brings in more companies into
the umbrella of small companies thereby exempting them “legally” from
compliance of various provisions of the Act and giving relief to such companies
from incurring expenditure on compliance.
The
paid-up capital slab of a small company has been enhanced from the existing
limit of 50 lakh rupees to 2 crore rupees whereas the turnover limit has also
been enhanced from 2 crore rupees to 20 crore rupees. Hence commencing from the
effective date of the amendment, for a company other than specifically excluded
companies, to be termed as a small company must satisfy the following
conditions:
·
The paid-up share capital of such company should
not exceed 2 crore rupees AND
·
Turnover of such company should not exceed 20
crore rupees.
EFFECTIVE
DATE:
DISCLAIMER:
This is a personal blog. Any views or opinions represented in this blog are personal and belong solely to the blog owner and do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries or damages from the display or use of this information.
For company registration, we require approval from ROC. Visit Vakilsearch website to ROC Filing
ReplyDelete